Natural language queries
Ask a question in plain English, and Optics BI uses your data to answer it. Explore performance, compare products or locations, and investigate what may be driving a change without writing code or building a report from scratch.
How it works and why that matters
Optics BI separates data calculations from AI interpretation. It works in two stages:
- The AI uses information about your dataset, including column names and data types, to translate your question into a structured request. This identifies the measures, filters, groupings and comparisons needed to answer it.
- A separate data-processing engine executes that request. The calculated results are then provided to the AI to explain the findings and suggest relevant next steps.
This means totals, averages and other measures are calculated from your data rather than relying on the language model to perform the arithmetic.
Privacy controls restrict which information is shared with the AI. The AI still receives information needed to interpret the results, so these controls matter at both the question-planning and explanation stages.
Why it helps
You can move from a business question to a useful explanation more quickly. Instead of manually assembling each calculation and chart, you can focus on understanding the findings and deciding what to investigate or act on next.
How you use it
Upload a dataset, open the Senior Analyst panel, and ask questions such as:
- “What are my top products by revenue?”
- “How have customer sales changed this quarter?”
- “Which states have the highest return rates, and what is the value of those returns?”
You can continue in the same conversation with follow-up questions such as “Why might that be happening?” or “Break that down by sales channel.” Optics BI uses the conversation context to continue the analysis.
Worth knowing
The quality of an answer depends on the data available and how the question is interpreted. Optics BI is designed to flag missing information or questions it cannot answer reliably.
Calculated results support the explanation, but recommendations and possible causes still require judgment. Where the data shows an association, treat it as a lead to investigate rather than proof that one factor caused another.